Corona Virus is a China military escaped bioweapon

The Chinese Corona Virus is desperately sought to be renamed Covid-19 by the WHO, why?

It is of Chinese origin and has infected more than 60,000 people around the world and killed more than 1,500, most of them in China’s Hubei province.

Chinese authorities have said the virus is believed to be from a seafood market in Wuhan, after a cluster of patients linked the market were identified in December.

But the first patient diagnosed by the virus never visited the market, according to a study published January 24 in The Lancet medical journal.  In the paper, the researchers, seven of whom work at Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital, said the first patient had no exposure to the market and there was also no epidemiological link between the first patient and the later cases.  The research was based on data from the first 41 patients with confirmed infections.

In fact, China’s Corona Virus outbreak has been found to have originated in a military lab linked to China’s biowarfare programme.   The Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) is a new strain of Coronavirus that has caused a pneumonia outbreak in China.  The deadly animal-borne coronavirus spreading globally may have originated in a laboratory in the city of Wuhan linked to China’s covert biological weapons program, said an Israeli biological warfare analyst.

The bioweapon is termed COVID-19, which is what the World Health Organsation has named Corona Virus.

Radio Free Asia has rebroadcast a Wuhan television report from 2015 showing China’s most advanced virus research laboratory, known the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The Wuhan Institute of Virology laboratory is the only declared site in China capable of working with deadly viruses.

Former Israeli military intelligence officer, Mr Dany Shoham, who has studied Chinese biological warfare, says the institute is linked to Beijing’s covert bio-weapons programme.

“Certain laboratories in the institute have probably been engaged, in terms of research and development, in Chinese [biological weapons], at least collaterally, yet not as a principal facility of the Chinese Bioweapon alignment.  Work on biological weapons is conducted as part of dual civilian-military research and is “definitely covert.”

Mr. Shoham maintains that China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology is the only institution capable of dealing with such lethal viruses and is closely linked with China’s biological warfare program.

Corona Patient Zero


Experts suspected that the virus is transmitted from animals to humans based on the first case found in the city of Wuhan.  However, there are mixed reports on when and how the virus started. A recent Wuhan City Administration and the World Health Organization (WHO) report states that the first individuals were infected between December 12 to December 29 while working at an unsanitary seafood market in Wuhan which was later shut down.

Subsequent to the report, however, a scientific paper written by a group of Chinese researchers published in The Lancet rebutted the previous claim by arguing that the first 13 out of 41 patients affected by the virus believed to be the 2019-nCoV had no contacts with the seafood market at all in early December.

“No epidemiological link was found between the first patient and later cases,” the report noted.

U.S. Senator Tom Cotton on February 18, 2020 has researched the outbreak and suggesting that the ongoing spread of Corona Virus is connected to research in the disease-ravaged epicenter of Wuhan, China.

Senator Cotton has referenced a notorious Chinese Communist Party bioweapon laboratory in the city of Wuhan called the Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory -“Cellular Level Biosafety Level 4” facility with a high level of operational security that works on researching dangerous pathogens.   It is situated close to the Huanan Seafood Market, which Beijing propaganda has falsely blamed for starting point for the Corona Virus’s spread.

Senator Cotton is referring to a notorious Chinese Communist Party bioweapon lab in Wuhan, a Chinese Corona Virus ‘patient zero’ is believed to be Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory research lab assistant Huang Yanling, a graduate who claims that she was patient zero in the novel coronavirus, but has since disappeared.

Chinese Coronavirus is linked to wild horseshoe bats, and to Chinese bat consumption, according to Wu Yuanbin, from China’s Ministry of Science and Technology.

Was this corona virus PATIENT ZERO?


Corona Virus ‘patient zero’ is purportedly a Chinese lab worker from a high security pathogen laboratory working with coronavirus infected bats, according to a paper by Chinese research biologists Botao Xiao and Lei Xiao.

They both point to a bloody incident at the Wuhan Centre for Disease control laboratory, WCDC, less than one mile from the disease epicentre at Wuhan fish market.  Entitled ‘The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus’ their joint paper stated:

“A researcher described that he was once attacked by bats and the blood of a bat shot on his skin. He knew the extreme danger of the infection so he quarantined himself for 14 days.”

The high security level 4 biosafety lab, BSL-4, was built in Wuhan in 2017 and Chinese microbiologists celebrated their entrance to the elite cadre empowered to wrestle with the world’s greatest biological threats.

Before the opening of the lab George Gao, director of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology in Beijing said: “It will offer more opportunities for Chinese researchers, and our contribution on the BSL-4-level pathogens will benefit the world.”

Such labs are often controversial, and there has been an expansion of BSL-4-lab networks in the United States and Europe over the past 15 years with more than a dozen now in operation or under construction in each region

“In another accident, he quarantined himself again because bats urinated on him.”

The scientists from the prestigious South China University of Technology in Guangzhou claimed the Wuhan WCDC “hosted animals in laboratories for research purposes”, including 605 bats captured in nearby provinces.

As well as the Wuhan wild animal food market, the lab is also located near the Union hospital where a group of doctors were among the first to become infected.

The many virologists conform to a different scenario, based on genetic analysis, that the virus was transmitted by a bat to another mammal between 20-70 years ago.  This intermediary animal, not yet identified, then passed it on to its first human host in the city of Wuhan in late November or early December 2019.

The Wuhan Institute Of Virology, we report the findings of our 5-year surveillance of SARSr-CoVs in a cave inhabited by multiple species of horseshoe bats in Yunnan Province, China.

A paper released by Xinglou Yang of the Wuhan Institute Of Virology described, “length genome sequences were obtained from five patients at the early stage of the outbreak. They are almost identical to each other and share 79.5% sequence identify to SARS-CoV. Furthermore, it was found that 2019-nCoV is 96% identical at the whole-genome level to a bat coronavirus.

The paper states:

“The Chinese horseshoe bats were natural reservoirs for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, SARS-CoV, which caused the SARS outbreak in 2003.”


China confirms new coronavirus can be transmitted between humans by the pneumonia-like virus:

“The Wuhan coronavirus’ natural host could be bats … but between bats and humans there may be an unknown intermediate.”

Trump’s soft touch with China’s Xi worries advisers who say more is needed to combat coronavirus outbreak

Of course an influenza virus is a focus for bio-weaponry.  It’s virulence a more effective pathogen than smallpox and Ebola virus.

Mohammad Madjid, MD with the University of Texas–Houston Health Center and two heart institutes in Houston says “The possibility for genetic engineering and aerosol transmission suggests an enormous potential for bio-terrorism.”

Influenza virus is far more accessible than smallpox virus, known stocks of which are held only in secure facilities in the United States and Russia, the authors note. They contend that influenza has other advantages over smallpox as a potential weapon:

Since influenza occurs naturally, an epidemic would have more time to spread before triggering a major public health response.  Postexposure immunization is ineffective for influenza because of its short incubation period (1 to 4 days), which is not the case with smallpox.

Influenza is also more difficult to eradicate because it has animal and avian reservoirs.

Influenza pandemics have form.  The Spanish flu epidemic of 1918 (involving the H1N1 influenza virus) killed between 20 million and 40 million people.

Influenza is usually transmitted by direct contact, but aerosol transmission also occurs and requires “27,000 times fewer virions to induce equivalent disease.”

In 2003, Influenza virus has been seen as possible bio-terrorist weapon due to its ready accessibility (it occurs naturally rather than being synthetically designed, and an epidemic would have more time to spread before triggering a major public health responses such  as with Corona Virus now in 2020.